Showing posts with label public schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public schools. Show all posts

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Charter Schools: They're Not Your Father's Country Club

It has taken a while, but I recently viewed Waiting for Superman. I viewed it after posting a guest blog by Miss C, a first grade teacher who discusses her experience at a corporate run charter school in the South Bronx. I invite you to read what she had to say here
The opening to Waiting for Superman is extremely important.  You might remember the scene where Davis Guggenheim describes the guilt he feels as he takes his own children pass public schools en route to their private (not charter) school.
Cue melancholy music.
Voice over: Every morning it's the same. Juice. Shoes. Backpack. The morning ritual and with it comes the uneasy feeling no matter who we are, or what neighborhood we live in. Each morning wanting to believe in our schools, we take a leap of faith. In 1999 I made a documentary about public school teachers. And I spent an entire school year watching them dedicate their lives to children. These teachers embodied a hope and carried with them a promise that the idea of public schools could work. Ten years later it was time to chose a school for my own children and then reality set in. My feelings about public education didn't mater as much as my fear of sending them to a failing school. And so every morning betraying the ideals I thought I lived by I drive by three public schools as I take my kids to a private school. But I'm lucky, I have a choice.
Is it really reality that set in or is it nothing more than another person of great wealth making a choice and not wanting to be morally responsible for that choice? 

I understand that Mr. Guggenheim may want to situate his decision to send his three children to private school as a societal dilemma, but it is clearly not that.  Society did not make Mr. Guggenheim chose private school.  He and perhaps his wife, actress Elisabeth Shue, made that decision--not you or me. If deciding to send his children to private school resulted in shame at choosing to betray ideals he thought he lived by, then that's something he needs to resolve.

What is unacceptable, however, is telegraphing his shame as ours and providing through his art a means for other wealthy people who hold a disproportionate amount of power in this country to eliminate public education and feel justified in doing so.  Mr. Guggenheim gives them this out in his docudrama by suggesting that "the worst possible example of public schooling in the United States" (Jay Mathews) is a suitable placeholder for ALL public schools. 

Further, he situates the complexity of learning with the simplicity of an input-output model and says that the issue of failure is caused by public schools being part of a bureaucracy. Guggenheim says:
It really should be simple. A teacher in a school house filling her students with knowledge and sending them on their way.
This gross misconception of learning, along with the image of the heroic superintendent (purple heart winner) who cannot reform D.C. public schools lay the foundation for the logic that allows the wealthy to say: We need something else, something new! Mr. Guggenheim serves up charter schools as that answer and in doing so allows for those with power and means to equate charter schools with their private school experiences.

Now perhaps Mr. Guggenheim thinks charter schools resemble Sidwell Friends School in D.C. where he went to school. Please note that to send your child there it would cost you between $33,000 and $38,000 per year, per child.  Sidwell is a long distance away from the schools highlighted in the film, as well as Miss C's charter school in the South Bronx. However, for the economically privileged like Mr. Guggenheim, private schooling may be the only recalled-child-memory available.

Zip Code
Like me, I imagined that you too shuddered when the mom in the film described her hopelessness and her desire to do better for her kids. She tells Guggenheim that "we're stuck."  He, a man with great means, replies, "That doesn't seem fair."  She answers, "It's not fair, but this is where we live."

You betcha.

Zip code in the United States means a lot and in places with significant wealth or poverty, zip code means everything as it influences EVERY aspect of living, not only schooling.  The differences between private schools that serve the elite and everything else is significant.  Consider what Miss C tells us about the charter she worked at in the South Bronx.  A school where she was reprimanded during a evaluation because a student breathed too loudly.  A school where new faculty are given a map that tells them how they will feel during a school year: struggling, keeping their heads above water and disillusionment. Does Sidwell offer such prophetic insight to their new staff? A school where children are overtly managed and controlled and given a steady and malnourished curriculum built upon behavior modification and test preparation.  A school where teachers are not permitted to talk with children, but only read from a script, less they face reduction in pay and dismissal.

No doubt, education in the United States needs attention and support that is steady, reliable, inspiring, and insightful.  We have too many examples of people with no or limited relevant experience being given control of large city school systems and failing miserably and publicly. Their failures (as well as the failures of those who appoint them) get spun into another example of why public schools need to be dismantled. The issues related to school redesign are complex and are always socially situated. We would do well to stop waiting for the heroic to arrive and engage local communities in the design of their public schools. Progress can be made, if we have a will to do so.

For profit schooling carries with it market values. We are fools to believe that for profit schools will privilege democratic ideals of caring and educating all above market rate returns.  The children who do not have advocates, the children who are poor, the children who are of color, the children who require special assistance, the children who don't appear to be catching on quickly, the children who misbehave, the children who speak out against the corporate entity that owns the school, and so on...These children will be left behind or used as fodder.

A democracy is only as strong as its public schools.

Starry, a painting by Samantha Caponera.

Friday, November 5, 2010

What Value is there in Using iPod Touches, iPod Nanos, FlipCameras, and iPads in School? Answering the Bureaucrat

14 months ago I left behind a professorship at a private college in NY and joined a public school PreK-12 system in NJ.  During this time period more than 700 Internet ready devices (iPod touches, laptops, netbooks, iPads) have been added to the high school, all of the district schools have been made wireless, and technology restrictions regarding what technology middle and high school students can bring to school and use (such as smartphones and other Internet ready devices) have been lifted.   These purchases, infrastructure changes, and policy revisions represent a commitment of public funds and public trust.  As such, the reasoning behind these acquisitions ought to be transparent.

I have found that it is not unusual then that I am asked by someone (such as auditors and state government types) to justify the purchases of iPods (Touch and Nano), flip cameras, and now iPads.  These are not mean spirited requests, but rather inquiries asking me to explain the purchases given the volume I have purchased and the funding sources I have used. I always dash off a response to satisfy the request as I am often in the middle of something that feels more pressing.  Tonight though, I have some time and thought a more thorough response might be in order, along with a request to those of you who read  this blog post to add your thoughts.

So how do we make use of iPod touches, iPod Nanos, iPads, e-readers (Kindle, Sony Reader) netbooks, laptops, flipcameras, IPEVO USB document cameras, as well as net-based services such as Web Design, software such as  Mathematica and Read-Write Gold, and many, many apps to name but a few?

We have dynamite administrators/supervisors, librarians/teachers, students, and computer techs/teachers who work collaboratively to try out hardware, apps, and software and then formally and informally teach one another.  Their work helps us to consider which apps we might want to ensure are on all devices (or most) and which ones will be reserved for more idiosyncratic uses. Some common uses of the iPod touch and iPad include serving as Internet ready devices that students use in the course of their learning. These on demand devices allow students to consume information and to use Web 2.0 apps and software to produce work.  They also allow for students to connect with others in the class and beyond the class through iChat, skype, twitter, ning, wiki, and email.

In weeks to come several teachers and supervisors will be guest bloggers and provide a more detail accounting as to the ways they engage learners and the technology they use to do so.   For now, I am going to simply list some of the ways these technologies are used to enhance, deepen, and complicate learning.

Students & Teachers use:
  1. Internet ready devices to connect to others.
  2. iPod touches and MacBooks to make podcasts.
  3. iPod touches, iPads, Sony Readers, and Kindles to read/listen to text and use Read,Write & Gold to create readable texts to hear.
  4. iPod touches in world language class to record dialogues in the target language and share the audio files with peers and their teacher who respond in the target language.
  5. many, many different apps on the iPod touch and the iPad such as: DropBox, Evernote, Star Walk, Tweet Deck, iBooks, Kindle App, Keynote, Pages, Numbers, Google (docs, gmail, calendar, blogger, etc.), Dragon Dictation, Dragon Search, Brushes, SoundHound, Pandora, Civilization Revolution, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Flipbook, Side by Side, The Elements A Visual Exploration, Free Books, You Tube, TED, Good Reader, Google Earth, History: Maps of the World.
  6. netbooks, iPads, and laptops to blog.
  7. laptops (and desktops) to edit film/images, produce weekly television broadcasts, make digital stories and Animoto films & post finished work on the Internet.
  8. any handheld device to access podcasts in order to review and/or strengthen learning.
  9. any handheld device to access how to videos and use jing to make videos.
  10. laptops to access Mathematica.
  11. any Internet ready device to access Web Assign and Moodle.
  12. iMacs to make music.
  13. MacBooks to run business simulations, make slideshows, iMovies, iBooks, run Final Cut Pro for film making.
  14. iPod Nanos to film, listen to music.
  15. Flip Cameras & digital cameras on field trips to record impressions, make walking poems, create art, record sights and sounds, record interviews.
  16. netbooks & laptops to video conference.
  17. Internet ready devices to watch film.
  18. Internet ready devices to check email.
  19. Internet ready devices to surf the web.
  20. Internet ready devices to send and receive tweets.
  21. iPods/iPads to record lectures.
  22. MacBooks to create digital portfolios (upload to iTunes)

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

When Everybody is a Public School Expert is it a Null Set? Take the Test.

The list of experts about public education seems to include almost everyone.   How about you?
See if you can pass this easy test that measures if you are an Educational Expert. You only need to get one right.

1. Are you a national or state level politician hoping to get re-elected or elected in November? You're an expert.
2. Have you ever visited a school to pose for a photo op? You're an expert (and perhaps you got # 1 right too). 
3. Did you make your first million (legally or not) by the age of 30? You're an expert (and perhaps you got numbers 1 and 2 correct).
4. Do you or have you ever hosted a TV show (any will really do)? You're an expert.
5. Are you a mayor or perhaps want to be a major of a town, hamlet, village, or city and think you'd like a crack at running the public schools? You're an expert.
6. Are you a news, TV, or Hollywood celebrity? You're an expert.
7. Are you or have you ever been a CEO of anything or perhaps married to one? You're an expert.
8. Do you have $100,000,000 to give away to a school district or perhaps your favorite charter school? You're an expert.
9. Do you have a degree in education that is honorary only? You're an expert.
10. Have you been teaching for under a year in a charter school somewhere in USA? You're an expert.
11. Did you play school when you were a child and then resist actually teaching as an adult? You're an expert.
12. Have you read a newspaper article about "the crisis in public schooling" in the last month? You're an expert.
13. Do you watch NBC? You're an expert.
14. Do you like to drink tea? You're an expert and could perhaps make a break into politics (see Tea Party. Remember, the education crisis could be your platform).
15. Are you a parent and not an actual public school educator? You're an expert.
16. Are you an educational consultant or technology whiz kid who has never actually taught or did so long ago for a brief amount of time? You're an expert.
17. Have you taken a quick route to the classroom via a summer teaching immersion course and have landed your first teaching job only to find yourself being interviewed about education? You're an expert.
18. Are you a commissioner of education who is formally a lawyer, a politician, and/or a CEO of something? You're an expert.
19. Do you offer commentary on crisis situations on TV (any crisis will do) or in a newspaper column? You're an expert.
20. Are you a columnist, TV Pundit, comic, or super hero? You're an expert.
21. Do you like to use words or phrases like pedagogy, standards-based, or 21st century skills or acronyms like NAEP, RTI, or NCLB, but can't really say what each means in practice? You're an expert.
22. Do you spend a lot of time talking to anyone about the crisis in "public" education, bad teachers &  administrators, and everything going to hell at dinner parties, your corner bar, soccer practice, or at the school bus stop? You're an expert.
23. Is your opinion about public education based on TV shows? You're an expert.
24. Have you never read or participated in any actual educational research? You're an expert.
25. Are you making or hoping to make your first (or second...) million selling your scientifically based research program to a school in need of improvement? You're an expert. 

Bonus Question: Even if you got none of the above correct, you can become an instant expert if you answer yes to the following:

Do you sometimes dream that a superhero (of your choice) is coming to rescue you and your community, and perhaps your country from the evil clutches of public school educators in order for all of you to race, race, race to some elusive top that only the superhero knows? 

Wow, move over Arne Duncan. You could be the next Secretary of Education.

No Lemming Left Behind. Image by Mary Ann Reilly (2009).