Friday, November 25, 2011

Thirteen: Simon's Story

I was so moved when I read this chapter about Simon a four-year-old child who had been labeled autistic. The text was written by Vivian Paley and recorded in her book, A Child's Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play. It is a most remarkable story about human connections, the possibility of story, and the the need to see beyond labels.  It always irks me when a child is referred to as x ( you can fill in the x) as if the sum of the person could be located as a single descriptor. I think of this often when I hear educators refer to children as bilingual or special education. I wonder if labels don't work to limit what we observe and our capacity to come to know, and in doing so allow us to substitute a false belief that what we think we know represents the whole of it. 

I was reading Tom Altepeter's (@tomaltepeter)recent blog post, Intercultural Responsiveness before and the two pieces of writing seemed to reinforce the belief in how important it is to be in the now--to not bring with me a set of already established assumptions or rules.

Both writers inspire me to be a bit better than I normally am. I have recorded the whole chapter as I thought it an important story inside an important book.  The link to the book is included.  On Kindle, the full book costs a little less than $6.00.  Well worth the cost.



From Paley, Vivian Gussin (2005-05-27). A Child's Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play. University of Chicago Press - A. Kindle Edition.

thirteen 
simon’s story 

Jaime’s use of fantasy play and formal dramatics to bridge our language differences was straightforward and clear. But Simon, another four-year-old whom I met the year before in an Indiana Head Start center, has a more difficult task. He has been labeled autistic and it seems doubtful that he will join the storytelling activities I have come to demonstrate.

The children know Simon well, however, though he paces the room as if he doesn’t see them. “What is Simon doing?” I ask Carly, who is about to dictate a story to me. “He’s a zoo man,” she says. Her tone implies that nothing is strange about the way Simon performs his role.

We watch Simon circle the room, punctuating his orbit with tiny cries and murmurs. His destination is a corner table under which a Lego zoo set awaits him, its plastic animals standing in a row. Once there, Simon crawls quickly to the animals and begins moving them across the tray, whispering to each one until they are all in place on the other side. Then he repeats his turn around the room and the process begins again.

“I think Simon is talking to the animals,” I comment, and Carly nods. “Walk walk,” she says. “He’s tellin’ them to walk.”

There would be much for Simon to observe as he passes around and through his classmates’ activities during “free-play,” if he slowed down and looked. In the blocks, a spaceship is going up, and, next to it, train tracks tunnel under a math table and swing around the doll corner, where a noisy baby bangs on a crib yelling “Mama!” Family members come running, draped in layers of dress-ups and talking into Lego pieces held up to their faces.

Near the sink, children at easels paint large round faces while their neighbors coil long snakes on the clay boards. “This snake is poison,” a boy warns one of the painters. “I’m makin’ him a nest, okay?” the girl responds, painting over the smiling face on her paper with broad purple strokes.

Everywhere are the recognizable scenes and sounds of children making and doing and pretending together. A “Chutes and Ladders” game is crowded with players and onlookers; two tables of children negotiate the use of several rolls of masking tape for their drawings, paper cuttings, and armaments; a child at the computer receives advice from those waiting their turns. Simon weaves through them all and stops for none. His own activity demands his entire attention.

Anthony is next on the story list. “Mine is Dracula,” he tells me and I print Dracula at the top of the page. “I wonder if Simon likes Dracula stories?” I ask. “Probably he does,” is his reply and launches into his story. “This is Dracula and there is a dinosaur and they don’t bite each other because they’re friends.” I can’t help smiling. It’s all about friendship: the play and the stories and the talk. But where does Simon fit in?

After several more stories, the children join me as I outline a stage with one of the rolls of masking tape. It may be the ripping of the tape that startles Simon, or the number of children crossing his path at once, but suddenly he is in our midst, stumbling through those seated along the edge of the tape. Back and forth he wanders, waving his arms until, with a series of shrieks, he returns to his appointed rounds.

“This is Holly’s story,” I say, holding up her paper. “She’s a bird at the top of a tree and she’ll need someone to be the tree, the mother bird, and a fish in the pond.” The actors are chosen in the order in which they are seated, and the story-play begins. I get no further than “The baby bird flies to the tree . . .” when Simon again bursts on to the stage, grabbing Holly’s legs while she continues to flap her wings, barely keeping upright.

“Simon, would you like to be a tree?” I ask anxiously, knowing there will be no response. Holly says calmly, “Simon is different.” She places her hand on his head to steady herself and steps back into her story. She is not annoyed by Simon’s behavior, nor are the other storytellers who follow. The actors carefully step over and around Simon, who now lies on his back moving his fingers across his eyes.

During recess, I remain in the room copying the children’s stories into my journal. Silently Simon reenters the room and carries his zoo tray to the empty stage. I watch as he lines up the animals and I sit beside him on the rug. “Walk walk walk,” he instructs the bear and I add, “The bear walks over the hill.”

Simon stiffens for a moment and glances in my direction. Then he moves the elephant through the blue patch of water and up the hill. His hand stays on the elephant as he waits for me to speak. “Walk walk,” I say. “The elephant walks over the hill.” By the time the children run in, Simon and I have together walked and talked to the lion, the giraffe, and the chimpanzee.

“Why is Simon doing his story now?” several children ask. “He brought his animals to the stage,” I say. “They are walking over the hill.”

The next morning, “doing stories” is one of many choices during free-play time. The story list fills up and I have no time to watch for Simon. Zoey, the second storyteller, requires my concentration. Her speech is hard for me to decipher and the only character in her story I am certain of is a “ki-ee-ca” (kittycat), because it meows. Fortunately the children at the table are familiar with her pronunciations and translate for me. “Can I be the frog?” Toby asks when the story is done, but Simon squeezes in beside Zoey before she can respond.

“Walk walk walk,” he begins, placing the zoo tray on top of Zoey’s story. He leans against us as he walks the bear to the top of the hill. “The bear walks over the hill,” I say. Next come the elephant, lion, giraffe, and chimpanzee, and Simon and I act out his zoo story just as we did the day before. But this time he adds the wolf and he smiles.

In chorus the children at the table recite, “Walk walk walk. The wolf walks over the hill.” Zoey’s voice is the loudest.

Paley, Vivian Gussin (2005-05-27). A Child's Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play (pp. 66-69). University of Chicago Press - A. Kindle Edition.

Valuing Children's Play in Kindergarten

Design made in a Building Center in Kindergarten Classroom.

In Vivian Gussin Paley's (2005) A Child's Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play, she recounts this story dramatized by five-year-olds:

“Pretend I’m a big sister just like you,” said a little girl, climbing out of a doll-corner crib. “I’m not a baby anymore. I’m you!”
“No! Don’t pretend that!” cautioned her playmate, suddenly remorseful, stepping out of her role. “Don’t be like me! Because I’m really bad!”
“Like the wolf?”
“Oh, wait, now it’s okay. I’m a good sister now.”

Paley, ever interested in recording and interpreting children's play, makes this connection:
Had I not heard these lines before? Isn’t this what the older brother warns the younger brother in Long Day’s Journey Into Night? Watch out for me, Eugene O’Neill has Jamie tell Edmond, I’m no good and I’ll try to bring you down to where I am. But I’m being a good brother now to tell you this" (p. 17).

Devon at Home, Before School
Paley wants us to understand that the child-inspired storytelling and dramatization that occurs naturally must be privileged once again in kindergarten.  She wisely reminds us that before there was school, there were stories.  She recounts this memory:
"When I was five, living in an immigrant neighborhood in Chicago, we stayed home and found our stories there. We created spaces and rituals in corners and under tables, listening to grown-up conversations at the kitchen table. We knew all the local shopkeepers by name and history and could walk to their stores by ourselves. We recognized the sounds of peddlers calling out their wares in the alley behind our building and ran to greet them.
The grocer invited us to pet the cat, and the fruit and vegetable man, the iceman, and the knife sharpener gave us sugar cubes to feed their horses. My friend Shirley called down to me from her third-floor back porch when she heard them coming: “Pirate ship ahoy!” (p. 35). 
Story and dramatization form the foundation upon which more formal learning might rest.  Yet, Paley knows that play is severely limited at school, even at the kindergarten level. From the 1980s to present, the reduction of child-inspired play has been limited and has been in part replaced with teacher- or school/district-determined learning centers, worksheets, and curricula directly connected to reading, writing, and computing. Instead of child-inspired stories, some schools have required specific genres as young as kindergarten where children who have only been on the planet for 60 months at most are asked to create memoir. Paley states:
By the mideighties we were trying to transform the children’s work into projects and learning centers, hoping the players would not detect the differences. It made us feel more like real teachers when we controlled the topic, and we seldom borrowed our themes from the children’s play (pp. 30-31).
An issue related to replacing children's spontaneous and self-directed play with these adult facsimiles is that "fantasy propels the child to poetic heights over and above his ordinary level and was considered the original pathway to literacy" (p. 32).  Now, though, "it is now perceived by some as an obstacle to learning. We are allowed to nourish play only so long as it initiates reading, writing, and computing. We continue to call play the work of young children while reducing its appearance to brief interludes. There is barely time to develop a plot or transform a bad guy into a hero. The educational establishment has ceased admiring the stunning originality of its youngest students, preferring lists of numerical and alphabetical achievement goal (pp. 32- 33).

How many numbers can the chid count?
How many letters can the child identify?
How many sight words does the child know?
What DRA level is the child?
And so on.

In our rush into reading, writing, and numeracy, we may want to pause and as, 'What is being lost?'  How might we begin to know and then tell that story? Paley offers us a method we can use to restore play as a central figure in kindergartens. She tell us to become keen observers and to record what the children say and do as they engage in dramatic play and to use this as source material for the adult stories we need to tell about young children, the importance of play, and learning..
We who value play must do more than complain of unwanted drills that steal away our time. We must find time for play and keep daily journals of what is said and done during play if we are to convince anyone of its importance. Our children will happily join us in the project by giving us their stories that so well explain their play when the stories are acted out (p.33).
I am wondering how many kindergarten classrooms still privilege children's spontaneous play?

A dramatic play area in a Kindergarten.

Work Cited
Paley, Vivian Gussin (2005-05-27). A Child's Work: The Importance of Fantasy Play. University of Chicago Press - A. Kindle Edition.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

New Global Picture Books 2011-2012

--> -->
Abdul-Jabbar, Kareem and Raymond Obstfeld. 2012. What Color Is My World? The Lost History of African American Inventors. Illustrated by Ben Boos. And A.G. Ford. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press.
Amado, Elisa. 2011. What Are You Doing? Illustrated Manuel Monroy. Toronto: Groundwood Books.
Illustration by Colin Bootman for Love Twelve Miles Long.
Armand, Glenda. 2011. Love Twelve Miles Long. Illustrated by Colin Bootman. New York: Lee & Low.
Becker, Helaine. 2012. Juba This, Juba That. Illustrated by Ron Lightburn. Toronto, Ontario: Tundra Books.
Benjamin, Floella. 2011. My Two Grandads. Illustrated by Margaret Chamberlain. London: Frances Lincoln Children’s Books.
Bertrand, Diane Gonzales 2011. Adelita and the Veggie Cousins/Adelita y las primas verduritas. Illustrated by Christina Ann Rodriguez. Houston, TX: Pinata Books.

Illustration by Sara Palacios for Marisol McDonald Doesn't Match/Marisol McDonald no combina.
Brown, Monica. 2011. Marisol McDonald Doesn’t Match/Marisol McDonald no combina. Illustrated by Sara Palacios. San Francisco, CA: Children’s Book Press.
Brown, Monica. 2011. Clara and the Curandera/ Clara y la curander. Illustrated by Thelma Muraida. Houston, TX: Pinata Books.
Celenza, Anna Harwell. 2011. Duke Ellington’s Nutcracker Suite. Illustrated by Don Tate. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge Publishing.
Cline-Ransome, Lesa. 2012. Words Set Me Free: The Story of Young Frederick Douglass. Illustrated by James Ransome. New York: Amistad.
Cofer, Judith Ortiz. 2011. A Bailar!/Let’s Dance. Illustrated by Christina Ann Rodriguez. Houston, TX: Pinata Books. 
Illustration by Raul Colon from Good-bye, Havana! Hola New York!
Colon, Edie. 2011. Good-bye, Havana! Hola New York! Illustrated by Raul Colon. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Croza, Laurel. 2011. I Know Here. Illustrated by Matt James. Toronto: Groundwood Books.
de la Pena, Matt. 2011. A Nation’s Hope: The Story of Boxing Legend Joe Louis. Illustrated by Kadir Nelson. New York: Dial.
Evans, Shane. W 2012. We March. New York: Roaring Book Press.
Flood, Nancy Bo. (Navajo). 2012. The Hogan that Great Grand Father Built. Illustrated by Peterson Yazzie (Navajo). Flagstaff, AR: Salina BookShelf. (Navajo/English recording).
Gillard, Denise. 2011. Music from the Sky. Illustrated by Stephen Taylor. Toronto: Groundwood Books.

Gilles Laroche's illustrations from If You Lived Here: Houses of the World.
Laroche, Gilles. 2011. If You Lived Here: Houses of the World. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Lyon, George Ella. 2011. All the Water in the World. New York: Atheneum/Richard Jackson Books.
McKissack, Patricia C. 2011. Never Forgotten. Illustrated by Leo and Diane Dillon. New York: Schwartz & Wade. 
Mitchell, Margaree King. 2012. When Grandmama Sings. Illustrated by James Ransome. New York: Amistad.
Illustration from Kadir Nelson's Heart and Soul.
Nelson, Kadir. 2011. Heart and Soul: The Story of America and African Americans. New York: Balzer & Bray.
Nivola, Claire A. 2011. Orani: My Father’s Village. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Paterson, Katherine. 2011. Brother Sun, Sister Moon. Illustrated by Pamela Dalton. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle.

Illustration by Zhu Cheng Liang for A New Year's Reunion.
Qiong, Yu Li. 2011. A New Year’s Reunion. Illustrated by Zhu Cheng Liang. Cambridge. MA: Candlewick Press.
Ramsey, Calvin Alexander. 2010. Ruth and the Green Book. Illustrated by Floyd Cooper. Minneapolis. MN: Carolrhoda Books.
Ray, Mary Lyn. 2011. Stars. Illustrated by Marla Frazee. New York: Beach Lane Books.
Ringgold, Faith. 2011. Henry Ossawa Tanner: His Boyhood Dream Comes True. Piermont, NH: Bunker Hill Publishing.
Rose, Naomi C. 2011. Tashi and the Tibetan Flower Cure. New York: Lee & Low Books.
Russo, Marisabina. 2011. I Will Come Back For You: A Family Hiding During World War II. New York: Schwarz & Wade.

From Allen Say's Drawing from Memory

Say, Allen. 2011. Drawing from Memory. New York: Scholastic Press.
Schubert, Leda. 2011. The Princess of Borscht. Illustrated by Bonnie Christensen. New York: Roaring Brook Press.
Shange, Ntozake. 2012. Freedom’s a-Callin Me. Illustrated by Rod Brown. New York: Amistad.
Trottier, Maxine. 2011. Migrant. Illustrated by Isabelle Arsenault. Toronto: Groundwood Books.
Uhlberg, Myron. 2011. A Storm Called Katrina. Illustrated by Colin Bootman. Atlanta, GA: Peachtree Publishers.
Vaughan, Marcia. 2011. Irena’s Jars of Secrets. Illustrated by Ron Mazellan. New York: Lee & Low.
Walker, Sally M. 2012. Freedom Song: The Story of Henry “Box” Brown. Illustrated by Sean Quails. New York: HarperCollins.

Illustrated by Paul Morin
Whetung, James (Anishinaabe). 2012. The Vision Seeker. Illustrated by Paul Morin. Markham, Ontario: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.
Winter, Jeanette. 2011. The Watcher: Jane Goodall’s Life with the Chimps. New York: Schwartz & Wade.
Yazzie, Seraphine G. (Navajo). 2011. Beauty Beside Me: Stories of My Grandmother ‘s Skirts. Illustrated by Baje Whitethorne, Sr.(Navajo). Narration by Elsie E. Carr. Flagstaff, AR: Salina BookShelf. (Navajo/English recording).
Young, Ed. 2011. The House Baba Built: An Artist’s Childhood in China. New York: Little, Brown Books for Young Readers.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

An Open Letter to Arne Duncan

Dear Mr. Duncan:

There are no coincidences. I have been struggling with writing to you ever since the #AskArne call was announced on Twitter.  I knew 140 characters wouldn't do it.

So today when I opened an email from TC Record, I read one commentary that caught my eye: Why We All Need Integrated Schools: A Critique of a 'Successful' Urban Charter School and I thought of you and the USDOE. Zoė Burkholder offers an insightful critique explaining why integrated schools are needed based on her visit to DC Prep, an urban charter school in Washington DC, not too far from where you are located. This past year 100% of the 8th graders at DC Prep scored proficiently on the District math and reading tests.  

Ms. Burkholder, though, asks an important question. 
As I sat through the presentation by DC Prep founder and CEO Emily Lawson, I began to wonder what it costs to raise test scores on reading and math to 100% proficiency. I don’t mean financial costs, although the charter school’s impressive fundraising history suggests that money doesn’t hurt. I mean what does it cost in terms of educational ideals to focus so intently on the single goal of academic achievement as measured by standardized tests in reading and math?
It is when Burkholder digs a bit deeper into the type of learning privileged at DC Prep that questionable practices arise.  She writes:
A major learning component at DC Prep includes what Lawson terms “character education.” Lawson, who is white and upper middle-class, explains that students wear uniforms and are expected to conform to a complex set of behavioral rules and codes. This includes strict silence in the hallways and eye contact and appropriate verbal responses to teachers. The list of social skills becomes more specific for each grade, for example, teachers evaluate fourth graders for their ability to follow directions, get the teacher’s attention appropriately, accept criticism, communicate honestly, and express their feelings appropriately. Behavior is monitored through the use of a yellow score card that each student carries all day long. Teachers reward students for good behavior and penalize them for bad behavior by instructing students to add or subtract a virtual dollar to their score cards. This kind of behavioral conditioning is visible in many “successful” urban charter schools, like the KIPP schools, which use hand signals and chants to reinforce behavior.
In April of last year, a former graduate student of mine wrote a compelling post, "Miss C Recounts Teaching at a South Bronx Charter School." In that post, Miss C, a first grade teacher, wrote: 
Along with endless test prep for NYS exams, assessment and the quest for data were drilled into our curriculum and practices. Never in my life had I such a dizzying array of assessments, especially in the primary grades. Our math curriculum came with weekly tests that I had to grade using actual percentages scrawled on top, which felt bizarre and cruel to hand back to a six year old (not to mention a stark contrast to my usual star or smiley face). We were instructed to keep data on everything, and make sure anything we put in a portfolio, or hung up on a bulletin board was aligned to a rubric and graded. Our heavily scrutinized bulletin boards--which I secretly referred to as bulletin boreds--were depressing exhibitions of uniform student work that was graded and accompanied by lists of NYS standards and rubrics so observers could see what the “purpose” of the assignment was and how/why students received whatever grade they got. Giving grades was bad enough: putting them on display in the hallway was even worse. Low grades were not permitted to be displayed, so some students never had work shown. Bulletin boards were no place for whimsical artwork adorned with painted handprints, glitter, or anything fun. Nothing “counted” unless it had a grade and was approved by administration...
...I wonder about the high test scores my previous school boasts, and if they are an indication of real learning, or the result of endless hours of relentless test-prep that has taught students how to choose the correct answer at the expense of actually learning anything valuable.
In Dressing the Corpse: Professional Development and the Play of Singularities,  I chronicled a beginning teacher at an urban public school in Pennsylvania.  The teacher toiling beneath the district demands to "finish the basal literacy program" was required to adhere to a pacing chart that accounted for all available time from the beginning of the school year through most of June and to test all of her 2nd graders weekly using a battery of district prescribed literacy assessments that were aligned to the National Reading Panel Report.  As a result, the teacher was more concerned with completing the requisite number of pages each day than on thinking about the meaning children made. After leaving the teacher one afternoon, I went home and wrote:
On my way home from Harding Street School, I wonder what sense Ms. Sheridan is making of her new career. Is this what she imagined and hoped teaching might be? What is being displaced by the considerable importance attached to completing the program? Ms. Sheridan is learning how to implement technical aspects of the program, but I can’t help but think that the costs of this development may be greater than we can calculate...Ms. Sheridan and teachers working in similar conditions who are required to keep to a script are a lot like epic characters: “bounded, pre-formed, individualized by their various situations and destinies, but not by varying ‘truths’” (Bakhtin, 1981, p. 35). Bakhtin explains that epic is “a man speaking about a past that is to him inaccessible” (1981, p. 13). As a closed text, program language can be mimed, but not lived; for it matters not how long or how well the bard tells the given story, it remains a story beyond his touch, influence, and rebuke. By requiring teachers to implement “proven” programs as epic, what local truths are silenced? What potential insights are missed?
Gilles Deleuze notes, “[b]eneath the general operation of laws, however, there always remains the play of singularities” (1994, p. 25). It is this play of singularities that is of interest here. When implementing epic programs, there is neither occasion nor disposition to attend to the singularities present in the classroom.
So hold those thoughts about control, absence of agency, and behavioral conditioning and now take a look at the questions Ira Socol raises in his latest post, What are We Teaching? 
So, I am forced to ask this question, what have we been teaching, in our schools, in our homes, in our churches, in our everyday lives, that has allowed so many completely amoral people to not just be among us, but to rise to positions of responsibility?
In the post Ira links together actions where military and police oppression of citizen speech resulted in physical harm and death and closes by reminding us:

But I'm going to add something, the University of California at Davis, like the Pennsylvania State University, are not isolated places. They are all of us. These crimes, or those on the streets of New York, or the streets of Oakland, or the streets of London, did not happen because of a few villains, they happened because we all stopped working hard enough to build a moral, fair society.
Mr. Duncan, I think we are racing to the top of the wrong priority. You and President Obama repeatedly discuss the need to secure our economic security via education.  I want to urge you that without first securing our moral will, we have little left to offer our youngsters but yellow cards where we mark their behavior and award or debit them accordingly.  The distance between this repeated behavior at children and the societal behaviors Ira outlines is very close--very aligned.  One might argue that the first done repeatedly will surely lead to adults who are at best compliant citizens too afraid to voice their opposition or to even know they ought to feel outrage.

As a mom, I would raise the roof if I had a child at any of the schools written about in this post. I imagine you and President Obama would too. And as certainly as we know this to be true, we also know that there are significant numbers of parents who are not privileged to take such an action. Their actual voices are often missing in these conversations. The assumptions that govern how learners and their teachers are situated at school bears notice more so than a single high stakes test measure done on the cheap.  Compliance is learned not only by what we say, but also by what we repeatedly do. Some questions to frame our viewing might include:
  1. Are teachers and students valued as contributors of curriculum, not merely vessels through which curriculum passes?
  2. Are teachers and learners privileged to work inside the messiness of error making, problem framing and solving, and reflection without the threat of reprimand based on students' performances on single state measures?  
  3. Are teachers and learners agents of their own learning?
  4. Are teachers and learners acted upon by forces beyond their control?
  5. Do teachers and learners toil beneath the weight of irrational pacing charts, scripted programs, and endless test prepping?
  6. Do teachers and principals fear job loss and does this influence their work?
  7. Do children fear retention and does this influence their learning?
  8. Are learners controlled by behavioral management methods that are akin to what one might find in a prison setting?
Nel Noddings (2007) in When School Reform Goes Wrong states, "Most reform movements, paradoxically, have been flawed by moral shortcomings" (p. 79).   I think we know this to be true. Noddings closes by not only asking for NCLB to be repealed, but also offers ten major changes to the USDOE to consider. I am not sure if you have read these, but I thought I would pass them along. The full text can be found on pages 81-83.  She is asking you and your agency to:
  1. Recognize explicitly that education is broader than schooling.
  2. Recognize explicitly that children are different in their aptitudes and interests...
  3. Shift attention in research to, or at least include research that questions, basic premises.
  4. Deemphasize randomized experiments and field trials.
  5. Study carefully the preparation of teachers.
  6. Discourage states and districts from using retention in grade and withholding diplomas on the basis of test scores.
  7. Recognize that children develop at different rates.
  8. Encourage responsible experimentation designed to increase relations of care and trust.
  9. Encourage the study of new ideas for universal education.
  10. Restore genuine respect for the full range of human talents and occupations.
The course we are on is wrong. It is harming our children, our moral center, and our economic security.  There is no shortage of voices demonstrating this through countless classroom and parental accounts.  We need to listen. The adherence to testing accountability as the sum of what makes a learner and the learner's teacher 'excellent' is irrational.  I urge you to broaden the field of influence and start over. Beginning with Noddings's list would make for a fine start.  I am volunteering to help and suspect I am not alone. 




A Quirky Look at Problem Solving

Oliver Jeffers reads from his new book, Stuck in the first video and discusses his problem solving approach to making the book in the second video.  An interesting and funny picture book that might well usher in a good discussion about problem solving approaches.









Work Referenced:
Jeffers, Oliver. 2011. Stuck, NY: Philomel.

Exploring Lines of Flight at School (and Not)


Lines of flight represent the creative impulses we compose while thinking and doing that offer a seemingly novel way to disrupt concepts cast as dualities. In fact, one might argue that it is the duality that may at first spark the line of flight: a way of moving beyond what is given to explore what might be.  I have been trying to conceptualize lines of flight within rhizomatic learning spaces. Even in the cognitively active classroom where learners are engaged in complex thinking and there is heightened neighbor interactions, the lines of flight beyond the purview of the classrooms and the lesson can be awesome, hard to discern, not in view, never privileged.

Heat out the window.

A 4th dimension inside our 3D world we can't discern.

So what to make us this?

Some things I am wondering and hope you might chime in on:

  1. How do we attend to the creative impulses of learners that occur outside the domain of the school and challenge binary ways of knowing--ways we might well be situating as truth ? 
  2. What types of environmental and pedagogical considerations might be necessary in order to leverage/cull/come to know such thinking?
  3. How might we 'carefully' come to know and invite in (if possible) these lines of flight within the classroom and/or the 'sanctioned' learning? 
  4. How often do we stop and acknowledge how little we know about our learners' learning lives beyond our purview?
  5. How might lines of flight de/colonize classrooms?
  6. How do lines of flight engender inquiry as opposed to categorization?
  7. All knowing is constructed. How do lines of flight offer us a method to reduce our binary ways of knowing that may overpopulate a classroom?


Thinking About Lines of Flight (Reilly, 2011)

Hmm.

I am a bit lost in this. A preferable place to be.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Call for Submissions for #NCTE's Language Arts

I received this via email today and wanted to post here for those of you not in the NRC List serv. These are the upcoming descriptions of work that is being solicited for NCTE's Language Arts journal. The first three are advertised on the NCTE site, the remainder are not.  Here's how you submit a manuscript.


May 2013: Community Literacy/ies
Guest Editors: Rebecca Rogers and Inda Schaenen.
Literacy/ies as sociocultural activities cannot be separated from the communities in which they are practiced. With literacy a continuing focus of educational policy, collaborations—between schools, families, universities, businesses, and cultural institutions—have been created to cultivate literacy development between and within communities. This issue of Language Arts explores how literacy-related collaborations influence and serve various communities. How have teachers, coaches, administrators, teaching artists, university faculty, parents, and children leveraged school-based literacy teaching and learning to serve community needs? How have community literacy practices been used to facilitate schoolbased literacy learning? What have we learned about literacy learning and development from educational interactions across communities? (Submission deadline: January 15, 2012)

July 2013: Inquiries and Insights (Summer)In this unthemed issue, we feature your current questions and transformations as educators, community members, students, and researchers. Many directions are possible in this issue. What tensions do you see in literacy education today? What do readers of Language Arts need to notice and think about? What inquiry work have you done that can stretch the field of literacy and language arts? Describe your process of learning about literature, literacy, culture, social justice, and language. What new literacy practices do you see in communities, after-school programs, and classrooms? What supports these practices? What is getting in the way of change? What connections are adults and children making as they engage in the art of language? Join us in creating a collection of inquiries and insights. (Submission deadline: March 15, 2012)

September 2013: Literacy Learning and Discourse
The ways people interact and communicate in social communities are highly interrelated with literacy. Close looks at interactions in classrooms, those within communities outside of classrooms, and influences of new literacies on our ways of interacting have provided important information pertaining to relationships between language, learning, identity, and ideology. In this issue of Language Arts, we invite articles that examine how people communicate (e.g., gestural, spoken, visual, written, etc.) in social settings (e.g., classroom, community, Internet). How does the interrelatedness of language and literacy play out in classroom life? How have technological shifts altered how teachers and students interact around print? (Submission deadline: May 15, 2012)


To be published: July 2013, January 2014
Inquiries and Insights
In these unthemed issues, we feature your current questions and transformations as educators, community members, students, and researchers. Many directions are possible in this issue. What tensions do you see in literacy education today? What do readers of Language Arts need to notice and think about? What inquiry work have you done that can stretch the field of literacy and language arts? Describe your process of learning about literature, literacy, culture, social justice, and language. What new literacy practices do you see in communities, after-school programs, and classrooms? What supports these practices? What is getting in the way of change? Whatconnections are adults and children making as they engage in the art of language? Join us in creating a collection of inquiries and insights.(Submission deadlines: For July, 2013, deadline is March 15, 2012; for January 2014, deadline is September 2012)


To be published: September 2013

Literacy Learning and Discourse
The ways people interact and communicate in social communities are highly interrelated with literacy. Close looks at interactions in classrooms, those within communities outside of classrooms, and influences of new literacies on our ways of interacting have provided important information pertaining to relationships between language, learning, identity, and ideology. In this issue of Language Arts, we invite articles that examine how people communicate (e.g., gestural, spoken, visual, written, etc.) in social settings (e.g., classroom, community, Internet). How does the interrelatedness of language and literacy play out in classroom life? How have technological shifts altered how teachers and students interact around print?
(Submission deadline: May 15, 2012)


To be published: November 2013

Innovations
As professionals, teachers are at the forefront of innovation in the language arts. Classrooms provide the space for new ideas, new instructional techniques, and new tools--but they’re not the only place for innovation. Sometimes innovations come from home experiences, afterschool programs, libraries, and communities. We invite manuscripts that describe exciting innovative practices that are enriching the lives of young people. Who is leading the way? What should we, as fellow educators, researchers, and family members, know about what’s going on? What conditions have led to innovative spaces and practices? In what ways are the innovations inviting children to participate in the language arts? How can we follow the lead of the most innovative practitioners?
(Submission deadline: July 15, 2012)



To be published: January 2014

Common Core or Rotten Core?
As the English Language Arts Common Core Standards are being implemented in U.S. schools, what is working? What's not? What are your views of the Common Core? Are they helpful? Hurtful? Will these new national standards transform schools? Or are they fatally flawed? This issue will present research about classroom ELA instruction and policy as well as commentary from teachers and researchers about the Common Core Standards. For this call, we invite submissions that are commentaries of 350 words or less in addition to our more traditional submissions (research studies, literature reviews, and theoretical pieces that are 6500 words or less). (Submission deadline: November 2012)